Vladimir Putin's assault on Ukraine makes it clear that he has taken Obama's measure as an easily intimidated, narcissistic Empyty Suit. The current crisis comes as no surprise. Benghazi; Boston; and Syria were signposts that have led us to another crisis invited by our projected weakness in international affairs. Our putative European allies have detected the scent of our diffidence and wisely withold their trust and keep their distance. The current affront was predictable (*). There will no doubt be other such provocative events given America's pathologically inept "leadership".
That leadership includes both political parties and the so-called "Mainstream Media" all of whom have buried their collective heads in the politically correct sands of reverse racism. America has been "fundamentally transformed" to the detriment of us all.
(*) Click here:
"[I]n every society there is a sizeable proportion of men and women who hate liberty - consequently truth. The aspiration to live in a tyrannical system, whether as a participant in the exercise of power, or . . . as a slave to it, serves to explain [the] rise and longevity of totalitarian regimes[.] Capitalistic democracies don't need to commit crimes in order to survive, while totalitarian states have no alternative."
Revel, Jean-Francois, Last Exit to Utopia, Encounter, NY, 2000, p. 86
The political Left is best understood as a secular religion with a distinctly narcissistic character. It is an arrogant, inquisitional faith led by a relentlessly aggressive, power-obsessed political class dedicated to imposing an egalitarian minimalism (“social justice”) on the world indicative of its coercive, totalitarian character.
Much of the political history of the extended twentieth century is that of massive extinctions of citizenries by their dictatorial governments. From the engineered mass starvations, torture chambers, firing squads, and gulags of Lenin and Stalin; Nazi gas chambers; Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge killing fields; the genocides of Mao’s ‘Great Leap Forward’ and the tyrannical North Korean Sung dynasty, over one-hundred million people have been slaughtered.
Systematically murdering millions to create an imagined, earthly Eden is clearly irrational. In this sense, Leftist ideology has the look of a religious inquisition.
In his introduction to Eric Voegelin’s “The New Science of Politics” (1) Dante Germino neatly captured Voegelin’s thesis of the Left as an atheistic ‘religion’:
[M[odern Gnosticism has been dedicated to the hubristic attempt to overcome the anxieties and uncertainties of human life by building a terrestrial paradise. However well-intentioned, even the ‘moderate proponents of the ‘progressive’ program bear a heavy responsibility for the disasters of humanity.
Others have alluded to this secular religious characterization of Leftist ideology:
- "Consider the millions of people who were killed by Stalin and Mao: although these tyrants paid lip service to rationaliy, communism was little more than a political religion. (2)
- "Marxism . . . was a a religious atheism, a secular religion that proposed to build utopia only to open the gates of hell[.[ (3)
- "The ability of the intellectual Left to survive the catastrophe of its Communist attachments derives from its essentially religious nature[.] (4)
Fischer (5) put it this way:
[T]otalitarianism represents the twentieth-century version of traditional religiousity; it is in many ways the secular equivalent of the religious life. Unless this crucial point is captured, the quintessential nature of totalitarianism will escape us."
This ‘totalitarian religiosity’ continues as a secular, politico-centric, faith disdainful of theistic beliefs and contemptuous of those who subscribe to them. It is a faith that, in its historical manifestations, has birthed the murderous tyrannies of the extended twentieth century: Tyrannies that have marched under left-wing banners of Marxism, Communism, and National Socialism or, more generally and descriptively, Coercive Collectivism.
For the past eighty-plus years America has been heading toward such an elitist tyranny in accordance with such socio-political contrivances as ‘New Deals’; ‘Great Societies’; ‘Fundamental Transformations’ and the steady, piecemeal abrogation of the Constitution. We have not yet reached the “Heil Hitler” or “Hail Stalin” state but we’re getting closer with the hope-and-change nihilisms of Critical Theory and arbitrary Postmodernist ‘relativisms’ (e.g.; “situational ethics”).
It is asserted here that this coercive faith has the character of an endemic narcissism. It is an arrogant faith led, and largely populated, by a relentlessly aggressive, power-obsessed political class dedicated to imposing an egalitarian minimalism (“social justice”) on the world.
While the classic definition of narcissism focuses on the individual, collective narcissism asserts that one can have a similar excessively high opinion of a group, and that group can function as a narcissistic entity.
In the broadest terms, this narcissistic entity is America’s Leftwing political establishment and the purveyor of an authoritarian collectivist faith. It is a faith largely populated by those in the high-visibility, look-at-me, intellectual professions of politics, the arts, teaching, journalism, and various political foundations. All are professions inordinately able to shape the public mind both short and long term. As such it is a propaganda-intensive collective which includes the left-biased “news” media; TV, and Film industries.
It is further asserted that the operating ethic of this narcissistic confederacy runs from feel-good, busybody, liberal, condescension (we know what’s best for everyone) to the arrogance of the more radical (“progressive”) wing for whom “the ends justify the means”. Implicitly, such an ethic reflects an over-riding need for power and control which, along with lying, are traits characteristic of pathological narcissism:
- Pathological lying is one of the hallmark characteristics of [the] narcissist, who does it out of a need to manipulate and maitain control.
- The narcissistic personality disorder trait of . . . lying [self-exempts] the narcissist from [being] responsible or accountable for questionable actions.
But for the Postmodernist left, lying is so integral to the furtherance of its authoritarian, revolutionary agenda that the word has effectively been deleted from the descriptive lexicon of leftist behaviors. As Bill Clinton once explained, "[i]t depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is." For the political right, however, no such "leniencies" are tolerated, and so has arisen the left's notorious double-standard.
One thinks of Benghazi; the IRS scandal; ObamaCare and the multiple “gate” scandals of the Clinton years two of which, Chinagate and Filegate, were quite likely impeachable offenses.
Narcissists have such an elevated sense of self-worth that they value themselves as inherently better than others, when in reality they have a fragile self-esteem, cannot handle criticism and will often try to compensate for this inner fragility by belittling or disparaging others in an attempt to validate their own self-worth.
Disparage is the proper term for ‘smear’ which is another narcissistic trait reflexively used by Leftists to demean any Conservative personalities whose popularity threatens them politically; or to derail any reasoned, factual, debate in which the Lefts’ characteristically emotion-driven positions are otherwise indefensible.
One example, of many, is the unjust and absolutely vile personal smears that have been, and continue to be, leveled at Sarah Palin and her family: Narcissistic shamelessness defined. Such vitriol can only be the expression of a visceral hatred held by the activist left for Conservatives who oppose the lefts’ de facto nullifications of America’s Constitutionally-established liberties.
It is a hatred fed to captive student audiences in university classroom-indoctrinating centers. It is a nihilistic hatred that shows-up in the activist left’s episodic window-smashing, car-burning, look-at-us, “street theatre”.
But hate and fear are the obverse sides of the same psychological coin.
Arguably, the fear side of this ‘coin’ is the transcendent fear of the so-called Human Condition which plagues us all at some level of consciousness: A fear of our eventual non-being coupled with the relentless uncertainties of life itself. Or, in the bumper-strip vernacular, “Life is hard; then you die”.
[H]undreds of published academic papers have shown that worrying about death [influences] everything from our prejudices and voting patterns . . . [to how] people deal with death by upholding worldviews that are larger and longer-lasting than themselves, and opposing anyone or anything that violates these ‘cultural anxiety buffers’.
Many on the Right find solace and guidance through the sensed presence of a transcendent Intelligence at the root of things and structure their lives accordingly. The secular-narcissistic Left dismisses this outlook as fanciful nonsense while working relentlessly to establish its own fanciful nonsense of fabricating a homogenous earthly Eden out of highly disparate human material.
“[T]o the religious gnostic, reality is a delusion, a creation of false consciousness. The religious revolutionary believes humanity creates its own reality.”(6)
“[I]n the arrogant ambition to transform human nature and remake the world . . . lies the true ancestry of the revolutionary Left.” (7)
It’s that “arrogant ambition” that defines the pathological narcissist and those who lust for leadership and the power and adulation that go with it.
One source put it this way:
- [N]arcissists are thought to seek leadership positions specifically to garner power that enables them to ‘structure an external world’ that supports their grandiose needs and visions.
- What [characterizes] these [narcissistic leaders] . . . is that ultimately, their leadership is driven by their own personal needs for power and admiration rather than by an empathic concern for the constituents they lead.
- [N]arcissists are just the type of leader to falter over time. Not only does their narcissism fuel their poor decision-making, but their [acquired] power . . . fuels their narcissism, driving a downward spiral into poor leadership.
[T]he enemy [of a free society] is not ideology, but [a] pathology [in which] . . . psychopathological mechanisms such as repression, projection, and deliberate misinformation serve to maintain the mass narcissism of a system literally based on mendacity.
America’s antiquated, fraud-prone electoral system, crafted in a more honest era, is too easily corrupted by any monied, charismatic, (8) power-lusting personality intent on fundamentally transforming America. Tons of money; Media hype; an obsolete, and a haphazard, easily-evadable vetting process, leaves the door readily ajar for those with revolutionary ambitions.
The great tragedies of history occur when men or women with extreme or deviant personality traits rise to a position of great power from whence they can do great damage.
1. Voegelin, Eric, The New Science of Politics, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1987, vii
2. Harris, Sam, The End of Faith, Norton, NY, 2004, 74
3. Anderson, Brian, Democratic Capitalism and its Discontents, ISI Books, Wilmington, DE, 2007, 21
4. Horowitz, David, The Politics of Bad Faith, The Free Press, NY, 1998, 15
5. Fischer, Klaus P., Nazi Germany: A New History, Continuum, 1996, 17
6. Horowitz, Ibid., 124
7. Horowitz, Ibid., 133
8. Oakes, Len, Prophetic Charisma, Syracuse Univ. Press, 1997
(*) This essay was originally published on American Thinker
Key words: Leftism. political religion, pathological narcissism, hate, fear, lying, double standard
Is our half-white president too black to fail?
As the saying goes “The more things change, the more they stay the same”. And so it seems to be with Hillary Clinton as she now reprises her ’08 pursuit of the Democrat Party nomination for POTUS. What seemed certain then, but wasn’t, seems even more certain this time around. On the plus side is the opportunity to also reprise David Horowitz’s earlier essay, Progressive Narcissism, exposing Hillary’s radical-Left beliefs as a core element of her cynical Jekyll-Hyde political persona.
Horowitz writes, regarding the then extant-Clinton presidency:
There are many unprincipled narcissists in politics. But there has never been a White House so thoroughly penetrated by the political minions of the left.
That is until now under Obama who has taken it to Politburo levels replete with Czars and disdain for the Constitution.
On a personal note Horowitz writes:
Ever since abandoning the utopian illusions of the progressive cause, I have been struck by how little the world outside the left seems to actually understand it. How little those who have not been inside the progressive mind are able to grasp the cynicism behind its idealistic mask or the malice that drives its hypocritical passion for “social justice”. (Emphasis added)
That observation applies particularly, shamefully, and incredibly to the feckless Republican Party which, as if in a stupor, does nothing to defend and protect the Constitution and America’s citizenry from the Hillary-Obama Left’s purposeful, incessant nullification of it.
GOP passivity in the face of this erosion of individual freedom is as egregious in its way as the direct subversion of it from the Left. Again, from the article cited:
Conservative misunderstanding of the Left is only part of the left’s own deceits. It also reflects the inability of conservatives to understand the religious nature of the progressive faith and the power of its redemptive idea.
This “religious nature” is, in effect, an Inquisition which must be defeated just as it is prosecuted: through persistent efforts, big or small, wrought on a daily basis.